Bring it on, John
Aug 27, 2004
Oliver North (
"Of course, the president keeps telling people he would
never question my service to our country. Instead, he watches as a
Republican-funded attack group does just that. Well, if he wants to have a
debate about our service in Vietnam, here is my answer: 'Bring it on.'" -- Sen.
As usual, you have it wrong. You don't have a beef with President George Bush
about your war record. He's been exceedingly generous about your military
service. Your complaint is with the 2.5 million of us who served honorably in a
war that ended 29 years ago and which you, not the president, made the
centerpiece of this campaign.
I talk to a lot of vets, John, and this really isn't about your medals or how
you got them. Like you, I have a Silver Star and a Bronze Star. I only have two
Purple Hearts, though. I turned down the others so that I could stay with the
Marines in my rifle platoon. But I think you might agree with me, though I've
never heard you say it, that the officers always got more medals than they
earned and the youngsters we led never got as many medals as they deserved.
This really isn't about how early you came home from that war, either, John.
There have always been guys in every war who want to go home. There are also
lots of guys, like those in my rifle platoon in Vietnam, who did a full 13
months in the field. And there are, thankfully, lots of young Americans today in
Iraq and Afghanistan who volunteered to return to war because, as one of them
told me in Ramadi a few weeks ago, "the job isn't finished."
Nor is this about whether you were in Cambodia on Christmas Eve, 1968. Heck
John, people get lost going on vacation. If you got lost, just say so. Your
campaign has admitted that you now know that you really weren't in Cambodia that
night and that Richard Nixon wasn't really president when you thought he was.
Now would be a good time to explain to us how you could have all that bogus
stuff "seared" into your memory -- especially since you want to have your finger
on our nation's nuclear trigger.
But that's not really the problem, either. The trouble you're having, John,
isn't about your medals or coming home early or getting lost -- or even Richard
Nixon. The issue is what you did to us when you came home, John.
When you got home, you co-founded Vietnam Veterans Against the War and wrote
"The New Soldier," which denounced those of us who served -- and were still
serving -- on the battlefields of a thankless war. Worst of all, John, you then
accused me -- and all of us who served in Vietnam -- of committing terrible
crimes and atrocities.
On April 22, 1971, under oath, you told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
that you had knowledge that American troops "had personally raped, cut off ears,
cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned
up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed
villages in fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun,
poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the country side of South Vietnam."
And you admitted on television that "yes, yes, I committed the same kind of
atrocities as thousands of other soldiers have committed."
And for good measure you stated, "(America is) more guilty than any other body,
of violations of (the) Geneva Conventions ... the torture of prisoners, the
killing of prisoners."
Your "antiwar" statements and activities were painful for those of us carrying
the scars of Vietnam and trying to move on with our lives. And for those who
were still there, it was even more hurtful. But those who suffered the most from
what you said and did were the hundreds of American prisoners of war being held
by Hanoi. Here's what some of them endured because of you, John:
Capt. James Warner had already spent four years in Vietnamese custody when he
was handed a copy of your testimony by his captors. Warner says that for his
captors, your statements "were proof I deserved to be punished." He wasn't
released until March 14, 1973.
Maj. Kenneth Cordier, an Air Force pilot who was in Vietnamese custody for 2,284
days, says his captors "repeated incessantly" your one-liner about being "the
last man to die" for a lost cause. Cordier was released March 4, 1973.
Navy Lt. Paul Galanti says your accusations "were as demoralizing as solitary
(confinement) ... and a prime reason the war dragged on." He remained in North
Vietnamese hands until February 12, 1973.
John, did you think they would forget? When Tim Russert asked about your claim
that you and others in Vietnam committed "atrocities," instead of standing by
your sworn testimony, you confessed that your words "were a bit over the top."
Does that mean you lied under oath? Or does it mean you are a war criminal? You
can't have this one both ways, John. Either way, you're not fit to be a prison
guard at Abu Ghraib, much less commander in chief.
One last thing, John. In 1988, Jane Fonda said: "I would like to say something
... to men who were in Vietnam, who I hurt, or whose pain I caused to deepen
because of things that I said or did. I was trying to help end the killing and
the war, but there were times when I was thoughtless and careless about it and
I'm ... very sorry that I hurt them. And I want to apologize to them and their
Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?
Oliver North is the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance, a
Townhall.com Gold Partner. He is also the author of several books, including War
Stories: Heroism in the Pacific, War Stories: Operation Iraqi Freedom, and War
Stories III: The Heroes Who Defeated Hitler.
Copyright © 2004 Townhall.com